@lgatt0 Not forgetting, of course, that the whole system of scholarly publishing was 'hijacked' by commercial players through the mid-20th Century (see 1.1.2) https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz
@acritschristoph @brembs You're speaking to two people working to do that exact same thing (eg https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz or https://t.co/lFI9PSoEKC), while arguing points where all the evidence is contrary. What's your proposal to improve a system that is fu
RT @Protohedgehog: Version 2! A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz vi…
RT @Protohedgehog: Version 2! A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz vi…
RT @Protohedgehog: Version 2! A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz vi…
RT @SciPubLab: A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent & future innovations in #PeerReview review – really a great work: https://t.co/…
RT @SciPubLab: A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent & future innovations in #PeerReview review – really a great work: https://t.co/…
RT @SciPubLab: A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent & future innovations in #PeerReview review – really a great work: https://t.co/…
RT @SciPubLab: A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent & future innovations in #PeerReview review – really a great work: https://t.co/…
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent & future innovations in #PeerReview review – really a great work: https://t.co/5twmmpXYKI #OA
Stack Exchange - communities downvote content that is low quality, and upvote the highest quality content. Why don't we have this simple system for research yet..? See Section 3.3 here: https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz #SpotOn17 via @F1000Research
@CosmicMarios Now wouldn't that be something ;) Something I think a lot more people are realising these days, We propose such a systemic shift in Section 4 here https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz #SpotOn17
RT @sherr_spadefoot: @benmarwick shared this article about peer review: https://t.co/IOCDRrJNQe I'm curious: Who has tried these alternati…
@benmarwick shared this article about peer review: https://t.co/IOCDRrJNQe I'm curious: Who has tried these alternatives? How do they work? Are they relevant for archaeology or more an issue in other fields?
RT @Protohedgehog: EXTREMELY IMPORTANT to consider this one small, very specific case study in the context of the large amount of research…
RT @Protohedgehog: EXTREMELY IMPORTANT to consider this one small, very specific case study in the context of the large amount of research…
RT @Protohedgehog: EXTREMELY IMPORTANT to consider this one small, very specific case study in the context of the large amount of research…
EXTREMELY IMPORTANT to consider this one small, very specific case study in the context of the large amount of research which has looked into this. https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz https://t.co/mvMK4zrxVT
RT @Protohedgehog: Imagine a publishing platform like Stack Exchange combined with GitHub, solving all issues in scholarly communication of…
@AnsonMackay @EarthArXiv @MicropalaeoSoc @OSFramework It's a community Q&A/publishing suite of connected platforms! See https://t.co/CPiatgHbXK and also the section here :) https://t.co/5cTl0XrWtK
@MitoRem @Canageek Check Section 2.2 here for some better discussion on this issue https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz
@mbeisen @eLife Did you see our epic paper on transforming the system of publishing and peer review? Jump to section 4 for the fun bit :) https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz
RT @pcmasuzzo: #opencon peeps might find this interesting: our #peerreview article now approved by 2 referees and therefore officially inde…
RT @dgraziotin: Our monster paper "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review" has been approved by…
RT @dgraziotin: Our monster paper "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review" has been approved by…
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations.... Tennant JP et al., published by @F1000Research, https://t.co/zZfxHntw56
Great article on peer review innovation https://t.co/YcuIertbdp
RT @dgraziotin: Our monster paper "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review" has been approved by…
RT @pcmasuzzo: #opencon peeps might find this interesting: our #peerreview article now approved by 2 referees and therefore officially inde…
#opencon peeps might find this interesting: our #peerreview article now approved by 2 referees and therefore officially indexed! Go and have a read, if you have not done it yet! #openscience https://t.co/BgCH10uUGI
Thank you @GinnyBarbour for your second review of our @F1000Research paper - 2 approvals now! Will get started on a revised version this week :) https://t.co/Kkzcu0D1Mq
@deceng @TirtoID Paper “rame2” ttg berbagai jenis PR (peer review), implikasinya serta pengembangannya dpt dibaca di sini https://t.co/uA02pkeAA7
RT @l_matthia: The result of a huge collaborative effort of over 30 beautiful minds brought together by @Protohedgehog. https://t.co/BMIvA…
RT @Protohedgehog: I've published in more than 10 different journals now, and have to say that the publishing+peer review process at @F1000…
RT @Protohedgehog: Imagine a publishing platform like Stack Exchange combined with GitHub, solving all issues in scholarly communication of…
RT @Protohedgehog: Imagine a publishing platform like Stack Exchange combined with GitHub, solving all issues in scholarly communication of…
RT @Protohedgehog: I've published in more than 10 different journals now, and have to say that the publishing+peer review process at @F1000…
RT @Protohedgehog: I've published in more than 10 different journals now, and have to say that the publishing+peer review process at @F1000…
I've published in more than 10 different journals now, and have to say that the publishing+peer review process at @F1000Research (and also @thePeerJ) is vastly superior to any other venue. https://t.co/E3PmiN8LMd
Lovely, thank you @dmoher for taking the time to go through our paper again! https://t.co/7mX1PCWegu #peerreview @F1000Research
RT @pcmasuzzo: The Introduction section of out #PeerReview article blogged by @Protohedgehog [https://t.co/FdgFUAkiQx]. Much easier to get…
Adding this to my reading list: https://t.co/FjDOjKWUHe
RT @Protohedgehog: Imagine a publishing platform like Stack Exchange combined with GitHub, solving all issues in scholarly communication of…
RT @Protohedgehog: Imagine a publishing platform like Stack Exchange combined with GitHub, solving all issues in scholarly communication of…
RT @pcmasuzzo: The Introduction section of out #PeerReview article blogged by @Protohedgehog [https://t.co/FdgFUAkiQx]. Much easier to get…
RT @pcmasuzzo: The Introduction section of out #PeerReview article blogged by @Protohedgehog [https://t.co/FdgFUAkiQx]. Much easier to get…
RT @pcmasuzzo: The Introduction section of out #PeerReview article blogged by @Protohedgehog [https://t.co/FdgFUAkiQx]. Much easier to get…
The Introduction section of out #PeerReview article blogged by @Protohedgehog [https://t.co/FdgFUAkiQx]. Much easier to get to know the subject and digest all the info like this! #openscience https://t.co/WoBiE0scVP
RT @Protohedgehog: Imagine a publishing platform like Stack Exchange combined with GitHub, solving all issues in scholarly communication of…
RT @Protohedgehog: Imagine a publishing platform like Stack Exchange combined with GitHub, solving all issues in scholarly communication of…
RT @Protohedgehog: Imagine a publishing platform like Stack Exchange combined with GitHub, solving all issues in scholarly communication of…
RT @Protohedgehog: Imagine a publishing platform like Stack Exchange combined with GitHub, solving all issues in scholarly communication of…
RT @Protohedgehog: Imagine a publishing platform like Stack Exchange combined with GitHub, solving all issues in scholarly communication of…
RT @Protohedgehog: Imagine a publishing platform like Stack Exchange combined with GitHub, solving all issues in scholarly communication of…
RT @Protohedgehog: Imagine a publishing platform like Stack Exchange combined with GitHub, solving all issues in scholarly communication of…
RT @Protohedgehog: Imagine a publishing platform like Stack Exchange combined with GitHub, solving all issues in scholarly communication of…
Imagine a publishing platform like Stack Exchange combined with GitHub, solving all issues in scholarly communication of quality control, certification, and incentivization. That's what we propose here: https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz via @F1000Research
@Doctor_Dick_MD We actually proposed such a platform recently in @F1000Research too! See Section 4 for the good part :) https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz
@SylvieVullioud @psm_os @CharlesOppenh @RickyPo @brembs @ingorohlfing @anjaoberlaender @unikonstanz @Protohedgehog @tonyR_H @oscharvard What about deploying an alternative for scholarly communication to get rid off all those stuff? See eg: https://t.co/bJI
The final word on peer review: https://t.co/8DQoDELmQD
RT @irynakuchma: A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent & future innovations in peer review - @Protohedgehog et al. https://t.co/MQSM…
RT @irynakuchma: A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent & future innovations in peer review - @Protohedgehog et al. https://t.co/MQSM…
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent & future innovations in peer review - @Protohedgehog et al. https://t.co/MQSMr6eUoT
RT @Protohedgehog: Whew, done finally! Thanks to all comments and reviews - much appreciated! https://t.co/qsRmcn9YGA #OAWeek17 #FORCE2017…
RT @Protohedgehog: @SciReports It's crap like this that a) makes the public mistrust science, and b) demands reformation of peer review/pub…
@SciReports It's crap like this that a) makes the public mistrust science, and b) demands reformation of peer review/publishing https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz
RT @dasaptaerwin: Peer review paper on peer review. Version 2 is up on @F1000Research https://t.co/a5KyueEm28 . Thank you @Protohedgehog &…
RT @dasaptaerwin: Peer review paper on peer review. Version 2 is up on @F1000Research https://t.co/a5KyueEm28 . Thank you @Protohedgehog &…
RT @dasaptaerwin: Peer review paper on peer review. Version 2 is up on @F1000Research https://t.co/a5KyueEm28 . Thank you @Protohedgehog &…
RT @dasaptaerwin: Peer review paper on peer review. Version 2 is up on @F1000Research https://t.co/a5KyueEm28 . Thank you @Protohedgehog &…
@martin_eve I have thoughts.. https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review - F1000Research https://t.co/Xyty0GdQMe
RT @Protohedgehog: Version 2! A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz vi…
@seis_matters @hildabast @Volcanologist @lemire @figshare Not that I know of (though @hildabast might know some?) There's a recent paper covering some of this stuff though: https://t.co/dIfnNg5kEj
@lgatt0 @slavovLab Well, luckily we don't need to have this discussion again as we've done it here in depth ;) https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz
@brembs @ingorohlfing @RickyPo @psm_os @anjaoberlaender @unikonstanz What about that proposal by @Protohedgehog @tonyR_H and many great co-authors recently published (see section 4)? https://t.co/bJIev3VJHG
RT @Protohedgehog: Section 1.1 of our new paper deals with the evolution and history of peer review. It's absolutely fascinating! https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: Section 1.1 of our new paper deals with the evolution and history of peer review. It's absolutely fascinating! https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: Section 1.1 of our new paper deals with the evolution and history of peer review. It's absolutely fascinating! https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: Section 1.1 of our new paper deals with the evolution and history of peer review. It's absolutely fascinating! https://t…
@Canageek @ubermichael This is the one https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz And you might have to explain that one a bit for me! :)
RT @Protohedgehog: Section 1.1 of our new paper deals with the evolution and history of peer review. It's absolutely fascinating! https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: Section 1.1 of our new paper deals with the evolution and history of peer review. It's absolutely fascinating! https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: Section 1.1 of our new paper deals with the evolution and history of peer review. It's absolutely fascinating! https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: Section 1.1 of our new paper deals with the evolution and history of peer review. It's absolutely fascinating! https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: Section 1.1 of our new paper deals with the evolution and history of peer review. It's absolutely fascinating! https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: Section 1.1 of our new paper deals with the evolution and history of peer review. It's absolutely fascinating! https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: Section 1.1 of our new paper deals with the evolution and history of peer review. It's absolutely fascinating! https://t…
RT @Protohedgehog: Section 1.1 of our new paper deals with the evolution and history of peer review. It's absolutely fascinating! https://t…
Section 1.1 of our new paper deals with the evolution and history of peer review. It's absolutely fascinating! https://t.co/5hI1TScYgz
RT @pcmasuzzo: version 2 is out! hope this will be useful to ppl exploring the #peerreview universe: https://t.co/0JVjIRvP9j. huge thx to @…
Happiness = receiving an email with a subject "Your article is published" ^.^ Great collaborative initiative & work! https://t.co/BD8jcmzRWm
RT @brembs: A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review https://t.co/aV2FfGN8bU
RT @brembs: A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review https://t.co/aV2FfGN8bU
RT @tonyR_H: Version 2 of our monster multi-disciplinary review of #peerreview innovations - out now! @protohedgehog https://t.co/RMYYnyZ5H…
RT @scigeist: A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective on Emergent and Future Innovations in Peer Review https://t.co/LzvGBkZV4j
RT @scigeist: A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective on Emergent and Future Innovations in Peer Review https://t.co/LzvGBkZV4j