RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review", has had almost 10,000 v…
Our paper, "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review", has had almost 10,000 views at @F1000Research already. https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX (And 16 citations, but who cares about them) #openscience
@Goldsteinm8ty There are plenty that already exist! Open Journal Systems by @pkp is a great example (https://t.co/BGEXMfr3BV), or @elife, and we propose a new model here too https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX (Section 4) HT @F1000Research
RT @Protohedgehog: @Adrian_Jacobo @gringene_bio @wait_sasha @docfreeride So a combined review and publishing platform? Check section 4 here…
@Jilyac Sort of like what we propose here. See the section on future challenges too. https://t.co/pg4MY5o1MG
@ktxby @EntheogenicRS Many people are raging against the machine every day! I’ve got ideas, but getting any traction takes an enormous amount of effort https://t.co/pg4MY5o1MG (which is why I’m focusing on education mostly with the @OpenSci_MOOC) :)
@PhotonsHarvest @docfreeride That's something we propose here, if interested https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn
@Adrian_Jacobo @gringene_bio @wait_sasha @docfreeride So a combined review and publishing platform? Check section 4 here, got you covered https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn
RT @Protohedgehog: @Blockgks We wrote here about how #Blockchain could be used to reform peer review - it's fascinating! https://t.co/qsRmc…
RT @Protohedgehog: @Blockgks We wrote here about how #Blockchain could be used to reform peer review - it's fascinating! https://t.co/qsRmc…
@IGDOREinstitute @Science_Open @paleorxiv @OpenSci_MOOC @OSFramework My life is a bit weird though now. I still do dinosaur research https://t.co/HMDYrA8MbP and have published on Open Access https://t.co/mXSHklNMET and Peer Review https://t.co/hU7oVR7OpJ w
@cane51000 @tonyR_H Yeah it's discussed in waaaay more detail here: https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX - but still very preliminary, hence presenting at #peere2018 to get some critical feedback.
RT @Protohedgehog: For a discussion on how AI could potentially be used to improve peer review, check out section 3.8 of our @F1000Research…
RT @Protohedgehog: For a discussion on how AI could potentially be used to improve peer review, check out section 3.8 of our @F1000Research…
For a discussion on how AI could potentially be used to improve peer review, check out section 3.8 of our @F1000Research paper: https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX #peere2018
@latwec @JennRichler Yes, great questions! See Section 4.1 here for some discussion on this - sorry I couldn't get an answer in! https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX (Would love to discuss this further over coffee) :) @mrgunn #peere2018
RT @Protohedgehog: @mrgunn I think I explained that badly - see Section 3.2 here for some better discussion on this :) https://t.co/AbXOC05…
@mrgunn I think I explained that badly - see Section 3.2 here for some better discussion on this :) https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX #peere2018
RT @yelkhatib: @jdhallphd yes. a recent one was this multi-disciplinary paper on peer review: https://t.co/fkiIFALdw9
@jdhallphd yes. a recent one was this multi-disciplinary paper on peer review: https://t.co/fkiIFALdw9
RT @Protohedgehog: @latwec @BioMedCentral Just gonna leave this here.. https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX #peere2018 https://t.co/iJXQhwU6Dh
RT @Protohedgehog: @latwec @BioMedCentral Just gonna leave this here.. https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX #peere2018 https://t.co/iJXQhwU6Dh
RT @Protohedgehog: @latwec @BioMedCentral Just gonna leave this here.. https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX #peere2018 https://t.co/iJXQhwU6Dh
RT @Protohedgehog: @latwec @BioMedCentral Just gonna leave this here.. https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX #peere2018 https://t.co/iJXQhwU6Dh
@latwec @BioMedCentral Just gonna leave this here.. https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX #peere2018 https://t.co/iJXQhwU6Dh
@Lieefje @ORCID_Org @digitalsci Feel free to cite us here (Section 3.7) in future developments for this btw ;) https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX @JorisRossum
RT @Protohedgehog: Off to Rome to #PEERE2018 to discuss how we can drag peer review into the digital age https://t.co/Wm7LVVsASt Can find o…
RT @Protohedgehog: Off to Rome to #PEERE2018 to discuss how we can drag peer review into the digital age https://t.co/Wm7LVVsASt Can find o…
RT @Protohedgehog: Off to Rome to #PEERE2018 to discuss how we can drag peer review into the digital age https://t.co/Wm7LVVsASt Can find o…
RT @Protohedgehog: Off to Rome to #PEERE2018 to discuss how we can drag peer review into the digital age https://t.co/Wm7LVVsASt Can find o…
Off to Rome to #PEERE2018 to discuss how we can drag peer review into the digital age https://t.co/Wm7LVVsASt Can find out more here: https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX
@p_casarotto @openscience For sure! That's one of the things we suggested in Section 4 here: https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX
"We also propose a novel hybrid platform model that could, at least partially, resolve many of the socio-technical issues associated with peer review, and potentially disrupt the entire scholarly communication system." https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX
RT @LouWoodley: This is a good, deeper dive into how peer review might borrow from other areas https://t.co/KA0n0n7lVr https://t.co/qhg4kze…
RT @Protohedgehog: "The business model of almost every scholarly publisher is predicated on free work by peer reviewers, and it is unlikely…
This is a good, deeper dive into how peer review might borrow from other areas https://t.co/KA0n0n7lVr https://t.co/qhg4kzeb0Z
RT @Protohedgehog: "The business model of almost every scholarly publisher is predicated on free work by peer reviewers, and it is unlikely…
RT @Protohedgehog: "The business model of almost every scholarly publisher is predicated on free work by peer reviewers, and it is unlikely…
RT @Protohedgehog: "The business model of almost every scholarly publisher is predicated on free work by peer reviewers, and it is unlikely…
"The business model of almost every scholarly publisher is predicated on free work by peer reviewers, and it is unlikely that the present system would function financially with market-rate reimbursement for reviewers." https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX #micdrop http
RT @l_matthia: The result of a huge collaborative effort of over 30 beautiful minds brought together by @Protohedgehog. https://t.co/BMIvA…
@jessicapolka @AngieNmnh @irenehames @rburdine1 @PEERe_REVIEW @ASAPbio_ @duffy_ma @StephenBHeard Totally agree there's a distinct lack of research overall into peer review, sadly - difficulties in gathering data one big barrier (some refs in sections 2.3 &
RT @uoclibrary: https://t.co/kdgPYNNNHb Peer review: its the way we've always done it, but it has some serious failings in our digital worl…
RT @uoclibrary: https://t.co/kdgPYNNNHb Peer review: its the way we've always done it, but it has some serious failings in our digital worl…
♻@socarxiv: https://t.co/oEwSJB8IHQ Peer review: its the way we've always done it, but it has some serious failings… https://t.co/Xfijo5gyPb
RT @uoclibrary: https://t.co/kdgPYNNNHb Peer review: its the way we've always done it, but it has some serious failings in our digital worl…
RT @uoclibrary: https://t.co/kdgPYNNNHb Peer review: its the way we've always done it, but it has some serious failings in our digital worl…
RT @lutzbornmann: Impressive overviews of journal peer review (research) https://t.co/BIlAg3SVqA
RT @lutzbornmann: Impressive overviews of journal peer review (research) https://t.co/BIlAg3SVqA
RT @lutzbornmann: Impressive overviews of journal peer review (research) https://t.co/BIlAg3SVqA
RT @lutzbornmann: Impressive overviews of journal peer review (research) https://t.co/BIlAg3SVqA
RT @uoclibrary: https://t.co/kdgPYNNNHb Peer review: its the way we've always done it, but it has some serious failings in our digital worl…
RT @devinberg: Finding different ways to make the work of peer review more attractive is probably necessary. https://t.co/BxdjrNpYZP
The simple fact is this: We need community collaboration to improve the quality of peer review and research. As we outline in Section 4 here, this involves harmonising quality control, certification, and incentivisation, and that's difficult. https://t.co/
RT @Protohedgehog: Great to see crowd-sourced collaborative authoring taking off in research! HT @j_perkel https://t.co/xcQrIYOLdX We've do…
RT @uoclibrary: https://t.co/kdgPYNNNHb Peer review: its the way we've always done it, but it has some serious failings in our digital worl…
https://t.co/kdgPYNNNHb Peer review: its the way we've always done it, but it has some serious failings in our digital world. This is a great long piece on it's possible future. ^aa
Great to see crowd-sourced collaborative authoring taking off in research! HT @j_perkel https://t.co/xcQrIYOLdX We've done this for two papers now too: https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX and https://t.co/J6Qx6Edtpk - such an awesome way of working with people!
@AndrewGYork @LancasterSci This looks great! Similar what we proposed in Section 4 here too - feel free to use any ideas if they help :) https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX
RT @lutzbornmann: Impressive overviews of journal peer review (research) https://t.co/BIlAg3SVqA
RT @lutzbornmann: Impressive overviews of journal peer review (research) https://t.co/BIlAg3SVqA
RT @lutzbornmann: Impressive overviews of journal peer review (research) https://t.co/BIlAg3SVqA
RT @lutzbornmann: Impressive overviews of journal peer review (research) https://t.co/BIlAg3SVqA
RT @lutzbornmann: Impressive overviews of journal peer review (research) https://t.co/BIlAg3SVqA
RT @lutzbornmann: Impressive overviews of journal peer review (research) https://t.co/BIlAg3SVqA
RT @lutzbornmann: Impressive overviews of journal peer review (research) https://t.co/BIlAg3SVqA
Impressive overviews of journal peer review (research) https://t.co/BIlAg3SVqA
RT @hug_sven: @EikoFried The topic of reviewer motivation & ways of incentivizing reviewers is quite hot in the field of research evaluatio…
RT @hug_sven: @EikoFried The topic of reviewer motivation & ways of incentivizing reviewers is quite hot in the field of research evaluatio…
RT @hug_sven: @EikoFried The topic of reviewer motivation & ways of incentivizing reviewers is quite hot in the field of research evaluatio…
@EikoFried The topic of reviewer motivation & ways of incentivizing reviewers is quite hot in the field of research evaluation as new ways of peer review are being explored & advocated right now (open peer review, post publication peer review, etc.
@chartgerink @mzelst Love this idea in all forms. It's similar to our proposal in Section 4 here, on using Web-native technologies to communicate research outputs more effectively https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX
@StephenLokier @Siccar_Point @BeckyCoats @WeAreVolcanica @seis_matters Actually, there is some evidence on this. See Section 2.4 here: https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX Success rates in 'unmasking' blinded authors is quite low. Needs way more data before making assu
Peer-review as a reddit-like model. Nice. https://t.co/lNlB9mN7rY
RT @laurajwilkinson: A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in #PeerReview by @Protohedgehog, @jmdugan, @dgra…
RT @laurajwilkinson: A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in #PeerReview by @Protohedgehog, @jmdugan, @dgra…
RT @laurajwilkinson: A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in #PeerReview by @Protohedgehog, @jmdugan, @dgra…
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in #PeerReview by @Protohedgehog, @jmdugan, @dgraziotin, et al. https://t.co/8bcWRJjRDv
RT @Protohedgehog: Morning session on #blockchain: Hype or game changer? We explored how it could be used to improve peer review here: http…
RT @Protohedgehog: How could #ArtificialIntelligence potentially improve peer review? We explored that here: https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX #AcadA…
RT @Protohedgehog: How could #ArtificialIntelligence potentially improve peer review? We explored that here: https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX #AcadA…
RT @Protohedgehog: How could #ArtificialIntelligence potentially improve peer review? We explored that here: https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX #AcadA…
RT @Protohedgehog: How could #ArtificialIntelligence potentially improve peer review? We explored that here: https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX #AcadA…
RT @Protohedgehog: How could #ArtificialIntelligence potentially improve peer review? We explored that here: https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX #AcadA…
How could #ArtificialIntelligence potentially improve peer review? We explored that here: https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX #AcadAPE #MachineLearning @F1000Research https://t.co/1HPCXH0eF4
RT @Protohedgehog: Morning session on #blockchain: Hype or game changer? We explored how it could be used to improve peer review here: http…
RT @Protohedgehog: Morning session on #blockchain: Hype or game changer? We explored how it could be used to improve peer review here: http…
RT @Protohedgehog: Morning session on #blockchain: Hype or game changer? We explored how it could be used to improve peer review here: http…
Morning session on #blockchain: Hype or game changer? We explored how it could be used to improve peer review here: https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX (Section 3.7) #AcadAPE
@adrian_mux Who said anything about preprints? I'm talking about postprint archiving (i.e., green OA). And I don't like that blatant mischaracterisation, especially after I've written things like this.. https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX
RT @Protohedgehog: What might the future of scholarly communication look like? One possibility here (see Section 4!) - imagine Stack Exchan…
RT @Protohedgehog: What might the future of scholarly communication look like? One possibility here (see Section 4!) - imagine Stack Exchan…
RT @Protohedgehog: What might the future of scholarly communication look like? One possibility here (see Section 4!) - imagine Stack Exchan…
What might the future of scholarly communication look like? One possibility here (see Section 4!) - imagine Stack Exchange with a GitHub backing and a Wikipedia-like moderation system.. https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX #AcadAPE
@anjgoswami And to pick up on your comment about bias in peer review, I’ve now written extensively about that issue (section 2.4 here https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX and this editorial https://t.co/2HVkCxfUkM)
@BrKloeckner @clovis_cormoran @seis_matters @mrgunn @Megan_Byrd23 @melbee85 @AcademicPain @brembs @oa_math @PLOSONE @PLOS JML is another great example! Fully agree with everything here - I guess the point is that more efficient publishing workflows exist a
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review https://t.co/ndhtDhxBB3 peer into the…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review https://t.co/ndhtDhxBB3 peer into the…
@jmox1234 @seis_matters @Megan_Byrd23 @melbee85 @AcademicPain @brembs @mrgunn Firstly that assumes a functioning market around journals/articles, which there is not. And yes, it's what a lot of people are converging on ideologically (e.g. Section 4 here: h
@clovis_cormoran @mrgunn @seis_matters @Megan_Byrd23 @melbee85 @AcademicPain @brembs @coreymhudson There are journals that already run on GitHub (see Sections 3.4 and 4 here https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX)