RT @aurelberra: Un superbe article sur l’évaluation par les pairs : état des lieux, historique, proposition. Je le recommande chaleureuseme…
RT @aurelberra: Un superbe article sur l’évaluation par les pairs : état des lieux, historique, proposition. Je le recommande chaleureuseme…
RT @crihunum: Le gagnant du Prix Jean-Claude Guédon pour 2018 est Jon Tennant pour son article « A multi-disciplinary perspective on emerge…
RT @crihunum: Le gagnant du Prix Jean-Claude Guédon pour 2018 est Jon Tennant pour son article « A multi-disciplinary perspective on emerge…
RT @crihunum: Le gagnant du Prix Jean-Claude Guédon pour 2018 est Jon Tennant pour son article « A multi-disciplinary perspective on emerge…
RT @crihunum: Le gagnant du Prix Jean-Claude Guédon pour 2018 est Jon Tennant pour son article « A multi-disciplinary perspective on emerge…
RT @aurelberra: Un superbe article sur l’évaluation par les pairs : état des lieux, historique, proposition. Je le recommande chaleureuseme…
RT @aurelberra: Un superbe article sur l’évaluation par les pairs : état des lieux, historique, proposition. Je le recommande chaleureuseme…
Un superbe article sur l’évaluation par les pairs : état des lieux, historique, proposition. Je le recommande chaleureusement. Well done, @Protohedgehog (et al.) ! #crihn2018 #peerReview
RT @crihunum: Le gagnant du Prix Jean-Claude Guédon pour 2018 est Jon Tennant pour son article « A multi-disciplinary perspective on emerge…
Le gagnant du Prix Jean-Claude Guédon pour 2018 est Jon Tennant pour son article « A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review » #crihn2018 @jcdrg @Protohedgehog https://t.co/PK3lRMqiut
RT @parnopaeus: Just met a co-author @tonyr_h from the big peer review paper in the elevator at #COASP10 - the joys of giant crowdsourced…
RT @Protohedgehog: For folks at #SciELO20, I have published in @F1000Research twice! And the process of review and publication has been far…
RT @Protohedgehog: For folks at #SciELO20, I have published in @F1000Research twice! And the process of review and publication has been far…
RT @Protohedgehog: For folks at #SciELO20, I have published in @F1000Research twice! And the process of review and publication has been far…
RT @Protohedgehog: For folks at #SciELO20, I have published in @F1000Research twice! And the process of review and publication has been far…
For folks at #SciELO20, I have published in @F1000Research twice! And the process of review and publication has been far better than any 'traditional' journal, in my view. https://t.co/J6Qx6Edtpk and https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX They are also 2 of my most hig
RT @parnopaeus: Just met a co-author @tonyr_h from the big peer review paper in the elevator at #COASP10 - the joys of giant crowdsourced…
@ChrisJohnsonEsq @prof_nch Here’s one. Led by @Protohedgehog https://t.co/5F2jNcSKjy
RT @Protohedgehog: @koen_hufkens @StackOverflow We discuss that here! Some communities already employ a very effective system for publishin…
@koen_hufkens @StackOverflow We discuss that here! Some communities already employ a very effective system for publishing https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn
"Proudly supported by Wiley". But in a good cause.....
RT @Protohedgehog: I've been shortlisted for an award from @Publons for my work as an ECR on innovating in peer review (see https://t.co/jc…
@JaniErola @MarkusVinnari @Luikki @JoMoisio @SociologicalSci Jon Tennant täällä Twitterissäkin puhuu paljon avoimesta tieteestä ja on kirjoittanutkin aiheesta muiden kanssa, esim. https://t.co/YYtNvQ9keE
RT @Protohedgehog: I've been shortlisted for an award from @Publons for my work as an ECR on innovating in peer review (see https://t.co/jc…
RT @Protohedgehog: I've been shortlisted for an award from @Publons for my work as an ECR on innovating in peer review (see https://t.co/jc…
RT @Protohedgehog: I've been shortlisted for an award from @Publons for my work as an ECR on innovating in peer review (see https://t.co/jc…
I've been shortlisted for an award from @Publons for my work as an ECR on innovating in peer review (see https://t.co/jcl0D3O1Rv and https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn for eg) If you like this stuff, please consider voting for me here! :) https://t.co/UUVEzf1F9M
RT @SusannaASansone: Looking back to the future of #peerreview https://t.co/NJ2dCnyX6M https://t.co/8AclTFAq8z
RT @Protohedgehog: @drpeterfreeman It's a really cool history! Recommend reading @AileenFyfe's works on this topic. We summarised the histo…
RT @SusannaASansone: Looking back to the future of #peerreview https://t.co/NJ2dCnyX6M https://t.co/8AclTFAq8z
RT @SusannaASansone: Looking back to the future of #peerreview https://t.co/NJ2dCnyX6M https://t.co/8AclTFAq8z
RT @SusannaASansone: Looking back to the future of #peerreview https://t.co/NJ2dCnyX6M https://t.co/8AclTFAq8z
RT @SusannaASansone: Looking back to the future of #peerreview https://t.co/NJ2dCnyX6M https://t.co/8AclTFAq8z
RT @Protohedgehog: @oliver_kathryn Best place to start is the summary here https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn and the articles cited within, especiall…
@oliver_kathryn Best place to start is the summary here https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn and the articles cited within, especially those by @AileenFyfe :) (cc @CharlesOppenh)
@drpeterfreeman It's a really cool history! Recommend reading @AileenFyfe's works on this topic. We summarised the history recently here: https://t.co/hDHU0IVSvD Has info on the origin of the term there too :)
RT @Protohedgehog: @ArmourMSG Yep, touched on that in that piece. More here too in Section 2.4 https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn - Dimensions of bias…
@ArmourMSG Yep, touched on that in that piece. More here too in Section 2.4 https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn - Dimensions of bias in peer review are complex.
@stho002 I used to be on the same page as you, but my views changed while writing this paper: https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn Check section 1.1 on the history of peer review, really interesting stuff (if you don't know it already) :)
Looking back to the future of #peerreview https://t.co/NJ2dCnyX6M https://t.co/8AclTFAq8z
@jonykipnis @mbeisen There are lots of proposals, but no-one has really seized the initiative to build them, bar perhaps F1000 (and eLife? But costly). A few of them mentioned in section 2 of this article, for starters: https://t.co/GaN9XcZJw0
@i_jayas @DrMel_T @biorxivpreprint I see what you're saying here, but the journals -> reach relationship is quite fuzzy. 2 of my top viewed/cited papers are both in F1000 https://t.co/J6Qx6Edtpk - 76 cites, https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX - 27 cites. Just have
@johnregehr I'm not sure. A big part of the community is here. If we agreed to use another system, then the paywalls would fall. If the users (we) stopped sponsoring this system, it wouldn't work. Alternative system: https://t.co/TA7Lhu8BmT
RT @Ricky_Jeffrey: A blog-post following from @OSFramework ambassador chat with @Protohedgehog & @rustyspeidel : "What will replace journal…
RT @Ricky_Jeffrey: A blog-post following from @OSFramework ambassador chat with @Protohedgehog & @rustyspeidel : "What will replace journal…
RT @Ricky_Jeffrey: A blog-post following from @OSFramework ambassador chat with @Protohedgehog & @rustyspeidel : "What will replace journal…
RT @Ricky_Jeffrey: A blog-post following from @OSFramework ambassador chat with @Protohedgehog & @rustyspeidel : "What will replace journal…
RT @Ricky_Jeffrey: A blog-post following from @OSFramework ambassador chat with @Protohedgehog & @rustyspeidel : "What will replace journal…
RT @Ricky_Jeffrey: A blog-post following from @OSFramework ambassador chat with @Protohedgehog & @rustyspeidel : "What will replace journal…
RT @Ricky_Jeffrey: A blog-post following from @OSFramework ambassador chat with @Protohedgehog & @rustyspeidel : "What will replace journal…
RT @Ricky_Jeffrey: A blog-post following from @OSFramework ambassador chat with @Protohedgehog & @rustyspeidel : "What will replace journal…
A blog-post following from @OSFramework ambassador chat with @Protohedgehog & @rustyspeidel : "What will replace journals’ blind peer review in the future? And why it might not matter so much for practitioners" https://t.co/E7aSzk7QAV (Table from: htt
@LizzieGadd @tonyR_H Interesting. "Machine learning is not about providing a total replacement for human input to peer review, but more how different tasks could be delegated or refined through automation." (Section 3.8 https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX) I think it'
@m_schlussel @DoctorZen @PeerJPreprints It's a good question, and all paths for me lead to 'no'. Imagine GitHub combined with Stack Exchange combined with Wikipedia. Some ideas here https://t.co/jcl0D3wqZX and Section 3/4 here https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX
@swarmpicker Mhm. I think I have a greater grasp of peer review than most, as this paper emphasises, as well as the numerous talks I've given on it. https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX This one too, which you are welcome to give feedback on https://t.co/jcl0D3wqZX
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review, has had more than 10,000…
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review, has had more than 10,000…
Our paper, A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review, has had more than 10,000 views on @F1000Research! Most of them are just me refreshing it to check the view count, but still.. https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX
@mbeisen This piece by @tonyR_H is excellent for summarising some of the major criticisms levied at peer review https://t.co/2rtlPQsqiY and lots of discussion in our paper on this too https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX
RT @Protohedgehog: @pierre_bellec @LebedevMikhailA @_yroy_ @mcgillu @UMontreal @HBHLMcGill @TheNeuro_MNI @MAIN_Community Peer review is rap…
“A popular and widely-cited editorial in The BMJ made some quite serious allegations at peer review, stating that it is “slow, expensive, profligate of academic time, highly subjective, prone to bias, easily abused, poor at... https://t.co/J62i4fYwhB
RT @TomSaundersNZ: @stho002 @guardian @Protohedgehog Peer review is another issue. People can choose when there are emaningful alternatives…
RT @Protohedgehog: @pierre_bellec @LebedevMikhailA @_yroy_ @mcgillu @UMontreal @HBHLMcGill @TheNeuro_MNI @MAIN_Community Peer review is rap…
@pierre_bellec @LebedevMikhailA @_yroy_ @mcgillu @UMontreal @HBHLMcGill @TheNeuro_MNI @MAIN_Community Peer review is rapidly evolving, see here for some stuff https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX For more cancellations, see this from @SPARC_NA https://t.co/teiRAlkrCc
RT @l_matthia: The result of a huge collaborative effort of over 30 beautiful minds brought together by @Protohedgehog. https://t.co/BMIvA…
RT @cMadan: @annemscheel We do Github-based peer review at @JOSS_TheOJ, though that's for software papers. Also might enjoy reading the 'fu…
@annemscheel We do Github-based peer review at @JOSS_TheOJ, though that's for software papers. Also might enjoy reading the 'future of peer review' paper led by @Protohedgehog https://t.co/5rKhjxUvWP
RT @l_matthia: The result of a huge collaborative effort of over 30 beautiful minds brought together by @Protohedgehog. https://t.co/BMIvA…
RT @Protohedgehog: @nbierne @yanivbrandvain @3rdreviewer @m_matschiner @magnusnordborg @GeneticsGSA Oh feel free to make general conclusion…
@nbierne @yanivbrandvain @3rdreviewer @m_matschiner @magnusnordborg @GeneticsGSA Oh feel free to make general conclusions.. ;) See this by @brembs for example https://t.co/mIYIRfV2Va on 'prestigious' journal unreliability and our study on the future of pee
@lteytelman @hjoseph So many challenges. This is exactly what we modelled here (section 4 https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn) while simultaneously solving research assessment and the ‘incentives’ debates too. No biggie ;)
@Gene_Regulation Interesting. What do you think of the ideas we suggest in Section 4 here..? https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review, just smashed through 10,0…
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review, just smashed through 10,0…
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review, just smashed through 10,0…
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review, just smashed through 10,0…
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review, just smashed through 10,0…
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review, just smashed through 10,0…
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review, just smashed through 10,0…
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review, just smashed through 10,0…
Our paper, A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review, just smashed through 10,000 views https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn Can we get a special badge for that, @F1000Research? :)
@parnopaeus @FrontiersIn @OSCP_Pitt @LibPubCoalition Ha! But isn't that a journal based on blockchain tech, rather than being about blockchain research..? Or is it both..? We gave it a nod here in Section 3.7! :) https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn
@thebyrdlab @StevenSalzberg1 @GreeneScientist @PAWellingMD @JACCJournals @chr1stph @biorxivpreprint Mega busy today and just winding down. A few general resources that spring to mind. https://t.co/pvFJi0UnRe https://t.co/mtwNelZd3X https://t.co/s5I6SjDGAN
RT @Protohedgehog: Scholarly publishing is stuck in 1999. Yup. https://t.co/UVS5I5p2dq See Section 4 here for a solution to this problem ht…
Scholarly publishing is stuck in 1999. Yup. https://t.co/UVS5I5p2dq See Section 4 here for a solution to this problem https://t.co/AbXOC05ORX https://t.co/rzSBQISvPa
@libcce @thefreemanlab Isn’t this sort of what @stencila will be..? But it’s also not that simple, as you need verification and certification aspects too. See section 4 here :) https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn
@FractalMan @cshirky This is what we propose here, if you scroll down to Section 4 https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn
RT @Protohedgehog: @lucklepper @nntaleb If only there were people working on that stuff already.. eg https://t.co/fbGLYa7Dpe and https://t.…
@lucklepper @nntaleb If only there were people working on that stuff already.. eg https://t.co/fbGLYa7Dpe and https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn (Section 3.7)
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review", has had almost 10,000 v…
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review", has had almost 10,000 v…
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review", has had almost 10,000 v…
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review", has had almost 10,000 v…
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review", has had almost 10,000 v…
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review", has had almost 10,000 v…
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review", has had almost 10,000 v…
@AndyDHigginson @ktxby @EntheogenicRS @springer @Publons I have a difference vision, which we outline in Section 4 here https://t.co/AbXOBZOdtn "Increasing the almost non-existent current role and recognition of peer review in promotion, hiring and tenure
Emerging models of peer review: https://t.co/bUAixo7Rbv
RT @Protohedgehog: Our paper, "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review", has had almost 10,000 v…